On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:18:54 -0700, bill.sloman wrote:
> On Sep 13, 3:40 am, Drexterity <1001w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Please, explain what that device has to do with a "proposed device
>> able to guide chemical reactions by positioning reactive molecules
>> with atomic precision." to this hopeless ignorant soul.
>
> Nobody here takes Drexler very seriously, and this thread has been
> happily satirising his proposition. If we ever do get into that kind
> of nanotechnology, it will probably be via genetic engineering, which
> has the advantage of being practicable.
---<quote>---
"As we work together on this site, I will often speak about you and I
working together as 'we'. This is because when and where you work to heal
your will, and redeem your spirit... We are there too. I am there. And I
have been here for so long, living out this pain with you, that I deeply
feel the desperation and sorrow of our lost selves, our lost love, and
our lost hope... Please release the judgments that say this healing must
come through destruction. I don't wish for this, and neither does your
Father. We love you... deeply into the DNA strands which keep our love
intertwined within your very self."
-- The Mother of Manifestation
---</quote>---
-- http://godchannel.com/msuperiority.html
Cheers!
Rich
|
